Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy Only for the Young? A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Depression Treatment

Standard

Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy Only for the Young? A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Depression Treatment. / Pabst, Alexander; Löbner, Margrit; Stein, Janine; Luppa, Melanie; Kersting, Anette; König, Hans-Helmut; Riedel-Heller, Steffi G.

In: FRONT PSYCHIATRY, Vol. 11, 2020, p. 735.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{2b0467002fab4830ab7bbc87f43117b5,
title = "Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy Only for the Young? A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Depression Treatment",
abstract = "Background: Late-life depression is a major public health concern, driving the development of complementary treatment options. This study investigates the effectiveness and acceptability of internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (iCBT) in older individuals (60+ years) compared to younger age groups.Materials and Methods: Secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial with 647 (18-82 years; mean 43.9) mild to moderately severe depressed primary care patients receiving either iCBT + treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Severity of depression was measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months. Intention-to-treat analysis in three age groups (18-39 years, n = 264; 40-59 years, n = 300; 60+ years, n = 83) was performed, using mixed-effects regression models to quantify treatment effect.Results: No age differences in the effectiveness of iCBT were found. Patients in the intervention group consistently showed a greater reduction in depression severity than controls in all three age groups and at both follow-ups. Effect sizes ranged from d = 0.30 (40-59 years, 6 weeks) to d = 1.91 (60+ years, 6 months). Uptake of the intervention was banded around 70% with no differences between age groups (χ² = 0.18, p = .915). The mean number of completed modules increased with age (χ² = 18.99, p = .040).Discussion: iCBT is equally effective in both younger and older individuals, thus providing a valuable complementary element of routine late-life depression care.Clinical Trial Registration: DRKS-ID: DRKS00005075 https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00005075.",
author = "Alexander Pabst and Margrit L{\"o}bner and Janine Stein and Melanie Luppa and Anette Kersting and Hans-Helmut K{\"o}nig and Riedel-Heller, {Steffi G}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2020 Pabst, L{\"o}bner, Stein, Luppa, Kersting, K{\"o}nig and Riedel-Heller.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00735",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "735",
journal = "FRONT PSYCHIATRY",
issn = "1664-0640",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy Only for the Young? A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Depression Treatment

AU - Pabst, Alexander

AU - Löbner, Margrit

AU - Stein, Janine

AU - Luppa, Melanie

AU - Kersting, Anette

AU - König, Hans-Helmut

AU - Riedel-Heller, Steffi G

N1 - Copyright © 2020 Pabst, Löbner, Stein, Luppa, Kersting, König and Riedel-Heller.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Background: Late-life depression is a major public health concern, driving the development of complementary treatment options. This study investigates the effectiveness and acceptability of internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (iCBT) in older individuals (60+ years) compared to younger age groups.Materials and Methods: Secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial with 647 (18-82 years; mean 43.9) mild to moderately severe depressed primary care patients receiving either iCBT + treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Severity of depression was measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months. Intention-to-treat analysis in three age groups (18-39 years, n = 264; 40-59 years, n = 300; 60+ years, n = 83) was performed, using mixed-effects regression models to quantify treatment effect.Results: No age differences in the effectiveness of iCBT were found. Patients in the intervention group consistently showed a greater reduction in depression severity than controls in all three age groups and at both follow-ups. Effect sizes ranged from d = 0.30 (40-59 years, 6 weeks) to d = 1.91 (60+ years, 6 months). Uptake of the intervention was banded around 70% with no differences between age groups (χ² = 0.18, p = .915). The mean number of completed modules increased with age (χ² = 18.99, p = .040).Discussion: iCBT is equally effective in both younger and older individuals, thus providing a valuable complementary element of routine late-life depression care.Clinical Trial Registration: DRKS-ID: DRKS00005075 https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00005075.

AB - Background: Late-life depression is a major public health concern, driving the development of complementary treatment options. This study investigates the effectiveness and acceptability of internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (iCBT) in older individuals (60+ years) compared to younger age groups.Materials and Methods: Secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial with 647 (18-82 years; mean 43.9) mild to moderately severe depressed primary care patients receiving either iCBT + treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Severity of depression was measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months. Intention-to-treat analysis in three age groups (18-39 years, n = 264; 40-59 years, n = 300; 60+ years, n = 83) was performed, using mixed-effects regression models to quantify treatment effect.Results: No age differences in the effectiveness of iCBT were found. Patients in the intervention group consistently showed a greater reduction in depression severity than controls in all three age groups and at both follow-ups. Effect sizes ranged from d = 0.30 (40-59 years, 6 weeks) to d = 1.91 (60+ years, 6 months). Uptake of the intervention was banded around 70% with no differences between age groups (χ² = 0.18, p = .915). The mean number of completed modules increased with age (χ² = 18.99, p = .040).Discussion: iCBT is equally effective in both younger and older individuals, thus providing a valuable complementary element of routine late-life depression care.Clinical Trial Registration: DRKS-ID: DRKS00005075 https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00005075.

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00735

DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00735

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 32848915

VL - 11

SP - 735

JO - FRONT PSYCHIATRY

JF - FRONT PSYCHIATRY

SN - 1664-0640

ER -