Dokumentation der differentiellen Behandlungsindikation bei depressiven Störungen: Entwicklung und Machbarkeitsprüfung des STEP-D (englisch: Setting Guide for Patients with Depression)

Standard

Dokumentation der differentiellen Behandlungsindikation bei depressiven Störungen: Entwicklung und Machbarkeitsprüfung des STEP-D (englisch: Setting Guide for Patients with Depression). / Brünahl, Christian Andreas; Depping, Miriam Katharina; Rickert, Pascal; Langs, Gernot; Löwe, Bernd.

In: PSYCHOTHER PSYCH MED, Vol. 69, No. 2, 02.2019, p. 57-62.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{169f3545c17049e2ab74928c0477c575,
title = "Dokumentation der differentiellen Behandlungsindikation bei depressiven St{\"o}rungen: Entwicklung und Machbarkeitspr{\"u}fung des STEP-D (englisch: Setting Guide for Patients with Depression)",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Depressive disorders require differential treatment. Therefore a new decision-tree (STEP-D, Setting Guide for Patients with Depression) was developed and evaluated to assist the documentation of the decision-process for a treatmentsetting for patients with depressive disorder.METHODS: The development of the decision tree followed several steps and was guided by the treatment guidelines. It was tested by 36 specialists on case reports. The case reports were rated with or without the decision tree. A questionnaire assessed transparency of the indication decision, simplification of documentation, time saving, improved communication in teams and confidence in the decision-making process.RESULTS: STEP-D was rated intelligible, feasible, and helpful to improve the communication in teams, transparency and documentation of indication decisions.CONCLUSION: Employing STEP-D can help documentation and facilitate communication with patients, benefactors and colleagues.",
keywords = "English Abstract, Journal Article",
author = "Br{\"u}nahl, {Christian Andreas} and Depping, {Miriam Katharina} and Pascal Rickert and Gernot Langs and Bernd L{\"o}we",
note = "{\textcopyright} Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.",
year = "2019",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1055/a-0583-0786",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "69",
pages = "57--62",
journal = "PSYCHOTHER PSYCH MED",
issn = "0937-2032",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dokumentation der differentiellen Behandlungsindikation bei depressiven Störungen: Entwicklung und Machbarkeitsprüfung des STEP-D (englisch: Setting Guide for Patients with Depression)

AU - Brünahl, Christian Andreas

AU - Depping, Miriam Katharina

AU - Rickert, Pascal

AU - Langs, Gernot

AU - Löwe, Bernd

N1 - © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Depressive disorders require differential treatment. Therefore a new decision-tree (STEP-D, Setting Guide for Patients with Depression) was developed and evaluated to assist the documentation of the decision-process for a treatmentsetting for patients with depressive disorder.METHODS: The development of the decision tree followed several steps and was guided by the treatment guidelines. It was tested by 36 specialists on case reports. The case reports were rated with or without the decision tree. A questionnaire assessed transparency of the indication decision, simplification of documentation, time saving, improved communication in teams and confidence in the decision-making process.RESULTS: STEP-D was rated intelligible, feasible, and helpful to improve the communication in teams, transparency and documentation of indication decisions.CONCLUSION: Employing STEP-D can help documentation and facilitate communication with patients, benefactors and colleagues.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Depressive disorders require differential treatment. Therefore a new decision-tree (STEP-D, Setting Guide for Patients with Depression) was developed and evaluated to assist the documentation of the decision-process for a treatmentsetting for patients with depressive disorder.METHODS: The development of the decision tree followed several steps and was guided by the treatment guidelines. It was tested by 36 specialists on case reports. The case reports were rated with or without the decision tree. A questionnaire assessed transparency of the indication decision, simplification of documentation, time saving, improved communication in teams and confidence in the decision-making process.RESULTS: STEP-D was rated intelligible, feasible, and helpful to improve the communication in teams, transparency and documentation of indication decisions.CONCLUSION: Employing STEP-D can help documentation and facilitate communication with patients, benefactors and colleagues.

KW - English Abstract

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1055/a-0583-0786

DO - 10.1055/a-0583-0786

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 29614527

VL - 69

SP - 57

EP - 62

JO - PSYCHOTHER PSYCH MED

JF - PSYCHOTHER PSYCH MED

SN - 0937-2032

IS - 2

ER -