A test for the implementation-maintenance model of reappraisal.

Standard

A test for the implementation-maintenance model of reappraisal. / Paret, Christian; Brenninkmeyer, Jessica; Meyer, Benjamin; Yuen, Kenneth; Gartmann, Nina; Mechias, Marie-Luise; Kalisch, Raffael.

In: FRONT PSYCHOL, Vol. 2, 2011, p. 216.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Paret, C, Brenninkmeyer, J, Meyer, B, Yuen, K, Gartmann, N, Mechias, M-L & Kalisch, R 2011, 'A test for the implementation-maintenance model of reappraisal.', FRONT PSYCHOL, vol. 2, pp. 216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00216

APA

Paret, C., Brenninkmeyer, J., Meyer, B., Yuen, K., Gartmann, N., Mechias, M-L., & Kalisch, R. (2011). A test for the implementation-maintenance model of reappraisal. FRONT PSYCHOL, 2, 216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00216

Vancouver

Paret C, Brenninkmeyer J, Meyer B, Yuen K, Gartmann N, Mechias M-L et al. A test for the implementation-maintenance model of reappraisal. FRONT PSYCHOL. 2011;2:216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00216

Bibtex

@article{801fcf91020648b7b15d2199ddea818a,
title = "A test for the implementation-maintenance model of reappraisal.",
abstract = "Reappraisal has been defined as a conscious, deliberate change in the way an emotional stimulus is interpreted, initiated in order to change its emotion-eliciting character (Gross, 2002). Reappraisal can be used to down-regulate negative emotions, including anxiety (reviewed in Kalisch, 2009). There is currently a strong interest in identifying the cognitive processes and neural substrates that mediate reappraisal. We have recently proposed a model (termed implementation-maintenance model or IMMO) that conceptualizes reappraisal as a temporally extended, dynamic, and multi-componential process (Kalisch, 2009). A key tenet of IMMO is that reappraisal episodes are marked by an early phase of implementation that may comprise strategy selection and retrieval of reappraisal material into working memory, and a later phase of maintenance that may comprise working memory and performance monitoring processes. These should be supported by dissociable neural networks. We here show, using a detachment-from-threat paradigm and concurrent functional magnetic resonance imaging, that reappraisal-related brain activity shifts from left posterior to right anterior parts of the lateral frontal cortex during the course of a reappraisal episode. Our data provide first empirical evidence for the existence of two separable reappraisal stages. Implications for further model development are discussed.",
author = "Christian Paret and Jessica Brenninkmeyer and Benjamin Meyer and Kenneth Yuen and Nina Gartmann and Marie-Luise Mechias and Raffael Kalisch",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00216",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "216",
journal = "FRONT PSYCHOL",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A test for the implementation-maintenance model of reappraisal.

AU - Paret, Christian

AU - Brenninkmeyer, Jessica

AU - Meyer, Benjamin

AU - Yuen, Kenneth

AU - Gartmann, Nina

AU - Mechias, Marie-Luise

AU - Kalisch, Raffael

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Reappraisal has been defined as a conscious, deliberate change in the way an emotional stimulus is interpreted, initiated in order to change its emotion-eliciting character (Gross, 2002). Reappraisal can be used to down-regulate negative emotions, including anxiety (reviewed in Kalisch, 2009). There is currently a strong interest in identifying the cognitive processes and neural substrates that mediate reappraisal. We have recently proposed a model (termed implementation-maintenance model or IMMO) that conceptualizes reappraisal as a temporally extended, dynamic, and multi-componential process (Kalisch, 2009). A key tenet of IMMO is that reappraisal episodes are marked by an early phase of implementation that may comprise strategy selection and retrieval of reappraisal material into working memory, and a later phase of maintenance that may comprise working memory and performance monitoring processes. These should be supported by dissociable neural networks. We here show, using a detachment-from-threat paradigm and concurrent functional magnetic resonance imaging, that reappraisal-related brain activity shifts from left posterior to right anterior parts of the lateral frontal cortex during the course of a reappraisal episode. Our data provide first empirical evidence for the existence of two separable reappraisal stages. Implications for further model development are discussed.

AB - Reappraisal has been defined as a conscious, deliberate change in the way an emotional stimulus is interpreted, initiated in order to change its emotion-eliciting character (Gross, 2002). Reappraisal can be used to down-regulate negative emotions, including anxiety (reviewed in Kalisch, 2009). There is currently a strong interest in identifying the cognitive processes and neural substrates that mediate reappraisal. We have recently proposed a model (termed implementation-maintenance model or IMMO) that conceptualizes reappraisal as a temporally extended, dynamic, and multi-componential process (Kalisch, 2009). A key tenet of IMMO is that reappraisal episodes are marked by an early phase of implementation that may comprise strategy selection and retrieval of reappraisal material into working memory, and a later phase of maintenance that may comprise working memory and performance monitoring processes. These should be supported by dissociable neural networks. We here show, using a detachment-from-threat paradigm and concurrent functional magnetic resonance imaging, that reappraisal-related brain activity shifts from left posterior to right anterior parts of the lateral frontal cortex during the course of a reappraisal episode. Our data provide first empirical evidence for the existence of two separable reappraisal stages. Implications for further model development are discussed.

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00216

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00216

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 2

SP - 216

JO - FRONT PSYCHOL

JF - FRONT PSYCHOL

SN - 1664-1078

ER -