A population-based comparison of cancer-control rates between radical and partial nephrectomy for T1A renal cell carcinoma.

  • Maxime Crépel
  • Claudio Jeldres
  • Maxine Sun
  • Giovanni Lughezzani
  • Hendrik Isbarn
  • Ahmed Alasker
  • Umberto Capitanio
  • Shahrokh F Shariat
  • Philippe Arjane
  • Hugues Widmer
  • Markus Graefen
  • Francesco Montorsi
  • Paul Perrotte
  • Pierre I Karakiewicz

Related Research units

Abstract

To complement existing data with population-based cancer control outcomes that account for the effect of other-cause mortality (OCM). Cancer control rates are virtually equivalent between partial (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for patients with T1aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To date, only 6 studies from centers of excellence examined cancer control rates after PN vs RN for T1aN0M0 RCC. OCM was unaccounted for in those studies, which may introduce a bias. We relied on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database and assessed cancer-specific mortality (CSM) after either PN or RN for T1aN0M0 RCC, in competing-risks models.

Bibliographical data

Original languageGerman
Article number4
ISSN0090-4295
Publication statusPublished - 2010
pubmed 20932408