Does a supplementary preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer change primary and secondary surgical interventions?

Standard

Does a supplementary preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer change primary and secondary surgical interventions? / Heil, Joerg; Bühler, Anne; Golatta, Michael; Rom, Joachim; Harcos, Aba; Schipp, Anne; Rauch, Geraldine; Junkermann, Hans; Sohn, Christof.

in: ANN SURG ONCOL, Jahrgang 18, Nr. 8, 08.2011, S. 2143-2149.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Heil, J, Bühler, A, Golatta, M, Rom, J, Harcos, A, Schipp, A, Rauch, G, Junkermann, H & Sohn, C 2011, 'Does a supplementary preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer change primary and secondary surgical interventions?', ANN SURG ONCOL, Jg. 18, Nr. 8, S. 2143-2149. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1565-y

APA

Heil, J., Bühler, A., Golatta, M., Rom, J., Harcos, A., Schipp, A., Rauch, G., Junkermann, H., & Sohn, C. (2011). Does a supplementary preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer change primary and secondary surgical interventions? ANN SURG ONCOL, 18(8), 2143-2149. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1565-y

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{914ca07c979740c8aaaddfa22a9f3d95,
title = "Does a supplementary preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer change primary and secondary surgical interventions?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether a supplementary preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) has changed number and methods of primary and number of secondary surgical interventions.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective controlled single-center analysis of 178 ILC patients. The 2 study groups consisted of 92 patients with breast MRI (MRI group) and of 86 patients without breast MRI (non-MRI group). We investigated the primary and final surgical procedures and factors that influenced the number of secondary surgical interventions.RESULTS: A total of 40 primary mastectomies (38%) have been performed in the MRI group, compared with 27 (30%) in the non-MRI group (P = .119).There have been more bilateral surgical interventions in the MRI group (14 vs 3 patients; P = .002). The 2 groups did not differ with respect to secondary surgery rates (P = .429). The MRI and non-MRI group were significantly different with respect to age and breast density (P = .003 and P = .002). Yet, both variables seemed not to influence secondary surgery rates (P = .516 and P = .788, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of preoperative breast MRI tended to result in more primary mastectomies and bilateral surgeries and did not seem to decrease the secondary surgery rate.",
keywords = "Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast, Carcinoma, Lobular, Cohort Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mammography, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Preoperative Care, Reoperation, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Clinical Trial, Journal Article",
author = "Joerg Heil and Anne B{\"u}hler and Michael Golatta and Joachim Rom and Aba Harcos and Anne Schipp and Geraldine Rauch and Hans Junkermann and Christof Sohn",
year = "2011",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1245/s10434-011-1565-y",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "2143--2149",
journal = "ANN SURG ONCOL",
issn = "1068-9265",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does a supplementary preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer change primary and secondary surgical interventions?

AU - Heil, Joerg

AU - Bühler, Anne

AU - Golatta, Michael

AU - Rom, Joachim

AU - Harcos, Aba

AU - Schipp, Anne

AU - Rauch, Geraldine

AU - Junkermann, Hans

AU - Sohn, Christof

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether a supplementary preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) has changed number and methods of primary and number of secondary surgical interventions.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective controlled single-center analysis of 178 ILC patients. The 2 study groups consisted of 92 patients with breast MRI (MRI group) and of 86 patients without breast MRI (non-MRI group). We investigated the primary and final surgical procedures and factors that influenced the number of secondary surgical interventions.RESULTS: A total of 40 primary mastectomies (38%) have been performed in the MRI group, compared with 27 (30%) in the non-MRI group (P = .119).There have been more bilateral surgical interventions in the MRI group (14 vs 3 patients; P = .002). The 2 groups did not differ with respect to secondary surgery rates (P = .429). The MRI and non-MRI group were significantly different with respect to age and breast density (P = .003 and P = .002). Yet, both variables seemed not to influence secondary surgery rates (P = .516 and P = .788, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of preoperative breast MRI tended to result in more primary mastectomies and bilateral surgeries and did not seem to decrease the secondary surgery rate.

AB - BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether a supplementary preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) has changed number and methods of primary and number of secondary surgical interventions.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective controlled single-center analysis of 178 ILC patients. The 2 study groups consisted of 92 patients with breast MRI (MRI group) and of 86 patients without breast MRI (non-MRI group). We investigated the primary and final surgical procedures and factors that influenced the number of secondary surgical interventions.RESULTS: A total of 40 primary mastectomies (38%) have been performed in the MRI group, compared with 27 (30%) in the non-MRI group (P = .119).There have been more bilateral surgical interventions in the MRI group (14 vs 3 patients; P = .002). The 2 groups did not differ with respect to secondary surgery rates (P = .429). The MRI and non-MRI group were significantly different with respect to age and breast density (P = .003 and P = .002). Yet, both variables seemed not to influence secondary surgery rates (P = .516 and P = .788, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of preoperative breast MRI tended to result in more primary mastectomies and bilateral surgeries and did not seem to decrease the secondary surgery rate.

KW - Breast Neoplasms

KW - Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast

KW - Carcinoma, Lobular

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Female

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Humans

KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

KW - Mammography

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neoplasm Invasiveness

KW - Preoperative Care

KW - Reoperation

KW - Survival Rate

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Clinical Trial

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1245/s10434-011-1565-y

DO - 10.1245/s10434-011-1565-y

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 21290193

VL - 18

SP - 2143

EP - 2149

JO - ANN SURG ONCOL

JF - ANN SURG ONCOL

SN - 1068-9265

IS - 8

ER -