Die transossäre Refixation der Extensoren bei chronischer radialer Epikondylopathie mit und ohne Rekonstruktion des LUCL-Komplexes--eine retrospektive Analyse von 101 Patienten
Standard
Die transossäre Refixation der Extensoren bei chronischer radialer Epikondylopathie mit und ohne Rekonstruktion des LUCL-Komplexes--eine retrospektive Analyse von 101 Patienten. / Ries, Christian; Franke, S; Dietrich, F; Jakubowitz, E; Dehlinger, F; Hollinger, B.
in: Z ORTHOP UNFALLCHIR, Jahrgang 151, Nr. 3, 06.2013, S. 296-301.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Die transossäre Refixation der Extensoren bei chronischer radialer Epikondylopathie mit und ohne Rekonstruktion des LUCL-Komplexes--eine retrospektive Analyse von 101 Patienten
AU - Ries, Christian
AU - Franke, S
AU - Dietrich, F
AU - Jakubowitz, E
AU - Dehlinger, F
AU - Hollinger, B
N1 - Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - INTRODUCTION: The chronic lateral epicondylitis (EHR) as a common pathology of the elbow is often associated with posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow (PLRI). After evaluation of intra-articular pathology by prior diagnostic arthroscopy, we aimed to build patient groups regarding the stability of the elbow joint. In patients with a stable elbow joint, open surgery with a debridement to the origin of the common extensor tendon and transosseous refixation was performed. Patients with relevant posterolateral rotatory instability, however, underwent an additional LUCL complex stabilisation using triceps tendon graft besides debridement as mentioned above. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical functional outcome between these groups.MATERIAL AND METHODS: 101 patients were included in our study. Arthroscopies were first performed on all patients to identify intra-articular pathological changes. In 26 patients with stable elbows, open surgery with debridement to the origin of the common extensor tendon and transosseous refixation was performed. For the other 75 patients who were found presenting a relevant posterolateral rotatory instability, a stabilisation of the LUCL in addition to the open procedure mentioned above was performed. Examinations and questionnaires were used for retrospective evaluation at follow-up.RESULTS: Both groups of patients revealed significant improvement in pain relief and elbow function. We observed no significant difference between the two methods concerning clinical and functional outcome.CONCLUSION: We recommend diagnostic arthroscopy with assessment of stability prior to the open performance to offer a more reliable evidence for surgical technique selection and therefore to achieve a better clinical outcome.
AB - INTRODUCTION: The chronic lateral epicondylitis (EHR) as a common pathology of the elbow is often associated with posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow (PLRI). After evaluation of intra-articular pathology by prior diagnostic arthroscopy, we aimed to build patient groups regarding the stability of the elbow joint. In patients with a stable elbow joint, open surgery with a debridement to the origin of the common extensor tendon and transosseous refixation was performed. Patients with relevant posterolateral rotatory instability, however, underwent an additional LUCL complex stabilisation using triceps tendon graft besides debridement as mentioned above. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical functional outcome between these groups.MATERIAL AND METHODS: 101 patients were included in our study. Arthroscopies were first performed on all patients to identify intra-articular pathological changes. In 26 patients with stable elbows, open surgery with debridement to the origin of the common extensor tendon and transosseous refixation was performed. For the other 75 patients who were found presenting a relevant posterolateral rotatory instability, a stabilisation of the LUCL in addition to the open procedure mentioned above was performed. Examinations and questionnaires were used for retrospective evaluation at follow-up.RESULTS: Both groups of patients revealed significant improvement in pain relief and elbow function. We observed no significant difference between the two methods concerning clinical and functional outcome.CONCLUSION: We recommend diagnostic arthroscopy with assessment of stability prior to the open performance to offer a more reliable evidence for surgical technique selection and therefore to achieve a better clinical outcome.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Arthroscopy/statistics & numerical data
KW - Combined Modality Therapy/statistics & numerical data
KW - Debridement/statistics & numerical data
KW - Female
KW - Germany/epidemiology
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data
KW - Prevalence
KW - Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data
KW - Recovery of Function
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Tendon Transfer/statistics & numerical data
KW - Tennis Elbow/diagnosis
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Young Adult
U2 - 10.1055/s-0032-1328578
DO - 10.1055/s-0032-1328578
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
C2 - 23696161
VL - 151
SP - 296
EP - 301
JO - Z ORTHOP UNFALLCHIR
JF - Z ORTHOP UNFALLCHIR
SN - 1864-6697
IS - 3
ER -