Bladder cancer stage and mortality: urban vs. rural residency

  • Marina Deuker
  • L Franziska Stolzenbach
  • Claudia Collà Ruvolo
  • Luigi Nocera
  • Zhe Tian
  • Frederik C Roos
  • Andreas Becker
  • Luis A Kluth
  • Derya Tilki
  • Shahrokh F Shariat
  • Fred Saad
  • Felix K H Chun
  • Pierre I Karakiewicz

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Relative to urban populations, rural patients may have more limited access to care, which may undermine timely bladder cancer (BCa) diagnosis and even survival.

METHODS: We tested the effect of residency status (rural areas [RA < 2500 inhabitants] vs. urban clusters [UC ≥ 2500 inhabitants] vs. urbanized areas [UA, ≥50,000 inhabitants]) on BCa stage at presentation, as well as on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other cause mortality (OCM), according to the US Census Bureau definition. Multivariate competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted after matching of RA or UC with UA in stage-stratified analyses.

RESULTS: Of 222,330 patients, 3496 (1.6%) resided in RA, 25,462 (11.5%) in UC and 193,372 (87%) in UA. Age, tumor stage, radical cystectomy rates or chemotherapy use were comparable between RA, UC and UA (all p > 0.05). At 10 years, RA was associated with highest OCM followed by UC and UA (30.9% vs. 27.7% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.01). Similarly, CSM was also marginally higher in RA or UC vs. UA (20.0% vs. 20.1% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.01). In stage-stratified, fully matched CRR analyses, increased OCM and CSM only applied to stage T1 BCa patients.

CONCLUSION: We did not observe meaningful differences in access to treatment or stage distribution, according to residency status. However, RA and to a lesser extent UC residency status, were associated with higher OCM and marginally higher CSM in T1N0M0 patients. This observation should be further validated or refuted in additional epidemiological investigations.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN0957-5243
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 02.2021
Extern publiziertJa
PubMed 33230694