PortalPublikationenA comparison of conventional and retrospective measures of c...

A comparison of conventional and retrospective measures of change in symptoms after elective surgery.

Standard

A comparison of conventional and retrospective measures of change in symptoms after elective surgery. / Bitzer, Eva M; Petrucci, Marco; Lorenz, Christoph; Hussein, Rugzan; Dörning, Hans; Trojan, Alf; Nickel, Stefan.

in: HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT, Jahrgang 9, 2011, S. 23.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Bitzer, EM, Petrucci, M, Lorenz, C, Hussein, R, Dörning, H, Trojan, A & Nickel, S 2011, 'A comparison of conventional and retrospective measures of change in symptoms after elective surgery.', HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT, Jg. 9, S. 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-23

APA

Bitzer, E. M., Petrucci, M., Lorenz, C., Hussein, R., Dörning, H., Trojan, A., & Nickel, S. (2011). A comparison of conventional and retrospective measures of change in symptoms after elective surgery. HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT, 9, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-23

Vancouver

Bitzer EM, Petrucci M, Lorenz C, Hussein R, Dörning H, Trojan A et al. A comparison of conventional and retrospective measures of change in symptoms after elective surgery. HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT. 2011;9:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-23

Bibtex

@article{023d8e7d7aa4419aa4ec726c6c359b91,
title = "A comparison of conventional and retrospective measures of change in symptoms after elective surgery.",
abstract = "Measuring change is fundamental to evaluations, health services research and quality management. To date, the Gold-Standard is the prospective assessment of pre- to postoperative change. However, this is not always possible (e.g. in emergencies). Instead a retrospective approach to the measurement of change is one alternative of potential validity. In this study, the Gold-Standard 'conventional' method was compared with two variations of the retrospective approach: a perceived-change design (model A) and a design that featured observed follow-up minus baseline recall (model B).",
keywords = "Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Questionnaires, Longitudinal Studies, Retrospective Studies, Postoperative Period, Patient Satisfaction, Mental Recall, Observation, Bias (Epidemiology), Preoperative Period, *Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Health Services Research/*methods, *Herniorrhaphy, Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods, *Surgical Procedures, Elective, Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Questionnaires, Longitudinal Studies, Retrospective Studies, Postoperative Period, Patient Satisfaction, Mental Recall, Observation, Bias (Epidemiology), Preoperative Period, *Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Health Services Research/*methods, *Herniorrhaphy, Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods, *Surgical Procedures, Elective",
author = "Bitzer, {Eva M} and Marco Petrucci and Christoph Lorenz and Rugzan Hussein and Hans D{\"o}rning and Alf Trojan and Stefan Nickel",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1186/1477-7525-9-23",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "23",
journal = "HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT",
issn = "1477-7525",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of conventional and retrospective measures of change in symptoms after elective surgery.

AU - Bitzer, Eva M

AU - Petrucci, Marco

AU - Lorenz, Christoph

AU - Hussein, Rugzan

AU - Dörning, Hans

AU - Trojan, Alf

AU - Nickel, Stefan

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Measuring change is fundamental to evaluations, health services research and quality management. To date, the Gold-Standard is the prospective assessment of pre- to postoperative change. However, this is not always possible (e.g. in emergencies). Instead a retrospective approach to the measurement of change is one alternative of potential validity. In this study, the Gold-Standard 'conventional' method was compared with two variations of the retrospective approach: a perceived-change design (model A) and a design that featured observed follow-up minus baseline recall (model B).

AB - Measuring change is fundamental to evaluations, health services research and quality management. To date, the Gold-Standard is the prospective assessment of pre- to postoperative change. However, this is not always possible (e.g. in emergencies). Instead a retrospective approach to the measurement of change is one alternative of potential validity. In this study, the Gold-Standard 'conventional' method was compared with two variations of the retrospective approach: a perceived-change design (model A) and a design that featured observed follow-up minus baseline recall (model B).

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Female

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Longitudinal Studies

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Postoperative Period

KW - Patient Satisfaction

KW - Mental Recall

KW - Observation

KW - Bias (Epidemiology)

KW - Preoperative Period

KW - Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic

KW - Health Services Research/methods

KW - Herniorrhaphy

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/methods

KW - Surgical Procedures, Elective

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Female

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Longitudinal Studies

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Postoperative Period

KW - Patient Satisfaction

KW - Mental Recall

KW - Observation

KW - Bias (Epidemiology)

KW - Preoperative Period

KW - Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic

KW - Health Services Research/methods

KW - Herniorrhaphy

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/methods

KW - Surgical Procedures, Elective

U2 - 10.1186/1477-7525-9-23

DO - 10.1186/1477-7525-9-23

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 23

JO - HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT

JF - HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT

SN - 1477-7525

ER -