A comment on the International Society of Geriatric Oncology guidelines: evidence-based advice for the clinical setting.

Standard

A comment on the International Society of Geriatric Oncology guidelines: evidence-based advice for the clinical setting. / Fitzpatrick, John M; Graefen, Markus; Payne, Heather A; Scotté, Florian; Aapro, Matti S.

in: ONCOLOGIST, Jahrgang 17 Suppl 1, 2012, S. 31-35.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b4d9f1869cd94efc8d3305772b9dfe6c,
title = "A comment on the International Society of Geriatric Oncology guidelines: evidence-based advice for the clinical setting.",
abstract = "Largely a disease of older men, prostate cancer is likely to become a growing burden in the developed world as the population ages and overall life expectancy increases. Furthermore, prostate cancer management in older men is not optimal, reflecting the lack of training dedicated to senior adults in fellowship programs and the lack of specific guidelines to manage senior adults. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) convened a multidisciplinary Prostate Cancer Working Group to review the evidence base and provide advice on the management of the disease in senior age groups. The Working Group reported that advancing age, by itself, is not a reliable guide to treatment decision making for men with either localized or advanced prostate cancer. Instead, the SIOG guidelines advise health care teams to assess the patient's underlying health status, which is largely dictated by associated comorbid conditions, but also by dependency in activities of daily living and nutritional status, and to use the findings to categorize the individual into one of four groups: healthy, vulnerable, frail, or terminally ill. The guidelines recommend that a patient categorized as healthy or vulnerable (i.e., with reversible problems following geriatric intervention) should receive the same approach to treatment as a younger patient. Frail patients should be managed using adapted treatment strategies, and the terminally ill should receive symptomatic/palliative care only. The guidelines may have ongoing relevance as the treatment options for prostate cancer expand.",
keywords = "Humans, Male, Aged, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Activities of Daily Living, Health Status, Life Expectancy, Geriatrics, Decision Making, Palliative Care/*methods, Geriatric Assessment/*methods, *Evidence-Based Medicine, Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology/*therapy, Humans, Male, Aged, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Activities of Daily Living, Health Status, Life Expectancy, Geriatrics, Decision Making, Palliative Care/*methods, Geriatric Assessment/*methods, *Evidence-Based Medicine, Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology/*therapy",
author = "Fitzpatrick, {John M} and Markus Graefen and Payne, {Heather A} and Florian Scott{\'e} and Aapro, {Matti S}",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "17 Suppl 1",
pages = "31--35",
journal = "ONCOLOGIST",
issn = "1083-7159",
publisher = "ALPHAMED PRESS",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comment on the International Society of Geriatric Oncology guidelines: evidence-based advice for the clinical setting.

AU - Fitzpatrick, John M

AU - Graefen, Markus

AU - Payne, Heather A

AU - Scotté, Florian

AU - Aapro, Matti S

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Largely a disease of older men, prostate cancer is likely to become a growing burden in the developed world as the population ages and overall life expectancy increases. Furthermore, prostate cancer management in older men is not optimal, reflecting the lack of training dedicated to senior adults in fellowship programs and the lack of specific guidelines to manage senior adults. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) convened a multidisciplinary Prostate Cancer Working Group to review the evidence base and provide advice on the management of the disease in senior age groups. The Working Group reported that advancing age, by itself, is not a reliable guide to treatment decision making for men with either localized or advanced prostate cancer. Instead, the SIOG guidelines advise health care teams to assess the patient's underlying health status, which is largely dictated by associated comorbid conditions, but also by dependency in activities of daily living and nutritional status, and to use the findings to categorize the individual into one of four groups: healthy, vulnerable, frail, or terminally ill. The guidelines recommend that a patient categorized as healthy or vulnerable (i.e., with reversible problems following geriatric intervention) should receive the same approach to treatment as a younger patient. Frail patients should be managed using adapted treatment strategies, and the terminally ill should receive symptomatic/palliative care only. The guidelines may have ongoing relevance as the treatment options for prostate cancer expand.

AB - Largely a disease of older men, prostate cancer is likely to become a growing burden in the developed world as the population ages and overall life expectancy increases. Furthermore, prostate cancer management in older men is not optimal, reflecting the lack of training dedicated to senior adults in fellowship programs and the lack of specific guidelines to manage senior adults. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) convened a multidisciplinary Prostate Cancer Working Group to review the evidence base and provide advice on the management of the disease in senior age groups. The Working Group reported that advancing age, by itself, is not a reliable guide to treatment decision making for men with either localized or advanced prostate cancer. Instead, the SIOG guidelines advise health care teams to assess the patient's underlying health status, which is largely dictated by associated comorbid conditions, but also by dependency in activities of daily living and nutritional status, and to use the findings to categorize the individual into one of four groups: healthy, vulnerable, frail, or terminally ill. The guidelines recommend that a patient categorized as healthy or vulnerable (i.e., with reversible problems following geriatric intervention) should receive the same approach to treatment as a younger patient. Frail patients should be managed using adapted treatment strategies, and the terminally ill should receive symptomatic/palliative care only. The guidelines may have ongoing relevance as the treatment options for prostate cancer expand.

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Aged

KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic

KW - Activities of Daily Living

KW - Health Status

KW - Life Expectancy

KW - Geriatrics

KW - Decision Making

KW - Palliative Care/methods

KW - Geriatric Assessment/methods

KW - Evidence-Based Medicine

KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology/therapy

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Aged

KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic

KW - Activities of Daily Living

KW - Health Status

KW - Life Expectancy

KW - Geriatrics

KW - Decision Making

KW - Palliative Care/methods

KW - Geriatric Assessment/methods

KW - Evidence-Based Medicine

KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology/therapy

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 17 Suppl 1

SP - 31

EP - 35

JO - ONCOLOGIST

JF - ONCOLOGIST

SN - 1083-7159

ER -